-
Strategy Development: DoD Counterinsurgency Simulations
Client: Department of Defense
Project duration: June-December 2017
Additional Reading: Peer Reviewed Articles in Systems Journal on Theory
Additional Reading: Peer Reviewed Articles in Systems Journal on Application
Project category: Strategy Development
Project Overview
The rise of ISIS in 2013-2014 challenged the Department of Defense (DoD) with applying counterinsurgency lessons learned in previous conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, it is difficult and dangerous to test policies for efficacy in a combat environment. The DoD needed a simulation environment, calibrated to ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and realistic of the challenges faced by regional commanders. This test environment could then be used to test policy options in isolation, combination, and at different timing windows and relative strength.
We had already begun developing just a simulation in late 2014 as part of our ongoing research efforts into violence and instability. We partnered with the Department of Defense beginning in 2017 to demonstrate the potential capabilities of such a simulation environment for operational planning, policy testing, and learning. One of the key findings was that ISIS operated as an emerging-state actor; which was fundamentally different than an insurgent force. This insight informed policy development for intervention options. We developed both a simulation capable of testing these policies as well as a small library of system archetypes and paradigms. The archetypes and paradigms distilled key findings from the simulation results for use by military planners, analysts, and commanders to better understand a fluid and dynamically changing environment.
Activities
Development of Emerging-State Actor Model (E-SAM) Simulation
Developed system paradigm of all actors by linking archetypes together
Calibration of E-SAM to Iraq & Syria and the rise of ISIS 2010-2020
Translation of US doctrinal options into policy test environment
Distill key feedback structure of simulation into system archetype and paradigms
Results
Simulation passed all relevant confidence-building tests
Distinguished policy options for emerging-state actors vs. insurgencies
Helped eliminate some policy options that could never work – or work only in limited timing windows
E-SAM reusable for other conflict environments or scenario forecasting